<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWW2008: Day 2 &#8211; LDOW2008 Workshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/2008/04/23/www2008-day-2-ldow2008-workshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/2008/04/23/www2008-day-2-ldow2008-workshop/</link>
	<description>I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf mutes ... or should I?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/2008/04/23/www2008-day-2-ldow2008-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-45753</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/?p=418#comment-45753</guid>
		<description>Wrt. Open Data Commons, I don&#039;t think anyone argued against the need for such an explicit licensing scheme (I really don&#039;t recall anyone saying that in the workshop). The problem that was raised, though, is that most (if not all) of the people in the Linking Open Data community do not hold rights over the data they published. We are just &quot;translators&quot;, and we can apply Open Data Commons just to the part we own: the interlinks. So perhaps the outreach should be done towards the &quot;raw&quot; data providers (hopefully the two communities will merge in a near future though).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrt. Open Data Commons, I don&#8217;t think anyone argued against the need for such an explicit licensing scheme (I really don&#8217;t recall anyone saying that in the workshop). The problem that was raised, though, is that most (if not all) of the people in the Linking Open Data community do not hold rights over the data they published. We are just &#8220;translators&#8221;, and we can apply Open Data Commons just to the part we own: the interlinks. So perhaps the outreach should be done towards the &#8220;raw&#8221; data providers (hopefully the two communities will merge in a near future though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Semantic Web mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/2008/04/23/www2008-day-2-ldow2008-workshop/comment-page-1/#comment-44655</link>
		<dc:creator>The Semantic Web mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/?p=418#comment-44655</guid>
		<description>[...] My colleagues Rob Styles and Nadeem Shabir provide their perspectives on the workshop. Other attendees sharing their perspectives include [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My colleagues Rob Styles and Nadeem Shabir provide their perspectives on the workshop. Other attendees sharing their perspectives include [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

