<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is LinkedData really more important than the Large Hadron Collider?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/2008/09/14/is-linkeddata-really-more-important-that-the-large-hadron-collider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/2008/09/14/is-linkeddata-really-more-important-that-the-large-hadron-collider/</link>
	<description>I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf mutes ... or should I?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/2008/09/14/is-linkeddata-really-more-important-that-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-53210</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/?p=464#comment-53210</guid>
		<description>Hi Nadeem,

Good to hear from you, and thanks for your comments :-)

That post was primarily to provide my thoughts on the LHC (as you can tell I don&#039;t particularly like it much), it certainly wasn&#039;t to say &quot;hey scrap X because Y is better&quot;.

The other thing that didn&#039;t really come through clearly on the post was that in order to get the data for the Linked Data Web we have to do experiments like this. Plus, in order to do Linked Data stuff we (as a Linked Data Community) need to work with the Scientists (who provide the data) which means we get stuff to link up and play with, and they get used to data which can be browsed *OR* queried.

Anyways, thank you ever so much for your critique. It&#039;s incredibly important. (My understandings and opinions of the world evolve, and I understand that they evolve, therefore, I am really appreciative when people give feedback).

Thanks again. 
See you again soon. 
 
Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nadeem,</p>
<p>Good to hear from you, and thanks for your comments <img src='http://www.virtualchaos.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That post was primarily to provide my thoughts on the LHC (as you can tell I don&#8217;t particularly like it much), it certainly wasn&#8217;t to say &#8220;hey scrap X because Y is better&#8221;.</p>
<p>The other thing that didn&#8217;t really come through clearly on the post was that in order to get the data for the Linked Data Web we have to do experiments like this. Plus, in order to do Linked Data stuff we (as a Linked Data Community) need to work with the Scientists (who provide the data) which means we get stuff to link up and play with, and they get used to data which can be browsed *OR* queried.</p>
<p>Anyways, thank you ever so much for your critique. It&#8217;s incredibly important. (My understandings and opinions of the world evolve, and I understand that they evolve, therefore, I am really appreciative when people give feedback).</p>
<p>Thanks again.<br />
See you again soon. </p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

